“No amount of evidence will ever persuade an idiot.” -Mark Twain
Charlie Kirk debates the points of abortion and trans rights.
The quote (from Mark Twain?) speaks to a frustrating truth in human psychology:
- Cognitive bias: People often cling to beliefs even when faced with overwhelming contradictory evidence.
- Confirmation bias: They seek out information that supports their views and ignore what doesn’t.
- Emotional reasoning: Logic takes a backseat when identity or ego is involved.
Twain—whether he said it or not—was known for skewering ignorance and hypocrisy. This quote fits right into his legacy of challenging dogma and celebrating critical thinking.
What did people say about this video?
@DOUBLEZZRANCH
1 month ago
She believes the louder she is, the more she’s right 😂
@BreakifyTV
2 days ago
Although he is no longer with us, I’ve become deeply involved in Charlie Kirk’s movement. I’ve watched every one of his videos and become a dedicated fan. I just wish I had discovered him while he was still alive. The assassin may have tried to silence him, but it only gave Charlie more voice and followers.
@GalaxyRaptor981
1 month ago
Being louder doesn’t mean you’re right
Let’s Break Down the Ideas
Loudness vs. Logic
This is where Twain’s quote gets complicated. For some, evidence isn’t the currency of persuasion—emotion, identity, and perceived injustice are. The assassination didn’t silence Kirk’s message; it amplified it among those already aligned with his views.
@DOUBLEZZRANCH and @GalaxyRaptor981 both critique the idea that volume equals validity. This directly ties to Twain’s quote—being loud doesn’t make one receptive to truth. In fact, it often signals the opposite: a refusal to engage with reasoned argument.
The louder someone insists they’re right, the more they may be shielding themselves from inconvenient facts. It’s not about persuasion—it’s about performance.
Martyrdom and Echo Chambers
@BreakifyTV introduces a different angle: the posthumous rise of Charlie Kirk’s influence. Whether one agrees with his politics or not, the comment reflects how belief systems can intensify when challenged or attacked.
This is a textbook case of:
- The futility of logic in emotionally charged discourse
- Belief reinforcement through conflict
- Identity-driven engagement
Leave a Reply